
pam
Quick Stats Overview
Best Build
Top Game Modes
Top Picks (Overall)
What makes pam unique?
Pam shows a highly inconsistent performance profile across different game modes, with results heavily dependent on the specific mode rather than trophy progression. In duo-showdown and trio-showdown, her win rates consistently fall below the 20% and 25% average benchmarks respectively, often hovering between 14% and 23%, indicating a significant struggle in team-based battle royale formats. Her solo-showdown performance is similarly poor, with win rates frequently dipping as low as 6.2% to 8.9%, well under the 10% baseline expected for this mode. Conversely, Pam demonstrates exceptional capability in objective-based modes like hot zone and gem grab. In hot zone, she achieves a peak win rate of 54.2% at 1000 trophies, surpassing the 50% average significantly. Gem grab follows a similar trend with a high of 57.4% at 1000 trophies, also well above the standard for non-battle-royale modes. While brawl ball and knockout show competitive numbers often near or slightly below the 50% mark, they do not reach the same heights as her top-performing modes. Her performance in bounty remains subpar, staying mostly between 29% and 39%. There is no clear upward trend with increasing trophies; instead, her success is isolated to specific high-skill ceilings in gem grab and hot zone.
🎯 Best Builds for Pam
Gadgets
SCRAPSUCKER
PULSE MODULATOR
Star Powers
MAMA'S HUG
MAMA'S SQUEEZE
Detailed Combinations
SCRAPSUCKER + MAMA'S HUG
SCRAPSUCKER + MAMA'S SQUEEZE
PULSE MODULATOR + MAMA'S HUG
PULSE MODULATOR + MAMA'S SQUEEZE
What is the best gadget and star power for Pam?
The highest performing combination for PAM pairs the Scrapsucker gadget with Mama's Hug, achieving a 54.3% win rate alongside a 36.7% usage frequency. The second most effective setup utilizes Scrapsucker with Mama's Squeeze, recording a 53.2% win rate and 23.04% usage. While the Pulse Modulator paired with either Mama's Hug or Mama's Squeeze yields lower results of 50.5% and 46.8% respectively, these variations still maintain notable adoption rates of 24.71% and 15.56%.